Developing and validating the nursing conscience perception questionnaire

Rostam Jalali, Parkhideh Hasani, Zhila Abedsaeedi, Mansour Rezaei

Abstract


Background: Conscience is the foundation of morality and influences private and professional life. Furthermore, conscience expresses the right image of right and wrong as well as good and bad. It helps nurses to hold their ethical integrity. How acts are led by conscience is different and how it is perceived by health care providers is unclear. Thus, the current study was carried out to develop a valid and reliable instrument to assess perception of nursing conscience.

Methods: In a methodological study, primary items of our previous phenomenological research systematic review and previous questionnaire were merged to a single questionnaire. Content face and construct validity was confirmed reliability of the questionnaire was measured by split half and Cronbach α coefficient.

Results: Factor analysis determined the five factors of conscience perceived ethical conscience, supervisor conscience, protective conscience, caring conscience and reaction of conscience. Furthermore, the reliability and validity were achieved by statistical tests. Α Cronbach for internal consistency was 0.945 and Guttmann splitting half was r=0.917. Content validity index was more than 90% for each item.

Conclusion: The nursing conscience perception questionnaire had 24 items and 5 dimensions and had both validity and reliability, but it needs to be tested over and over to enhance its validity and reliability.


Keywords


nursing conscience perception questionnaire, validity, reliability, validation, instrumental development

References


Sincox K. The conscience of the health care system. Michigan Nurse. August 2005: available at: www.minurses.org. Access date 20/10/2010.

Jensen A, Lidell E. The influence of conscience in nursing. Nursing Ethics. 2009;16(1):31-42.

Fawcett J. Analysis and evaluation of contemporary nursing knowledge: nursing models and theories. 2nd ed, Canada: F. A. Davis Co. 2005;7-9.

Dahlqvist V, Soderberg A, Norberg A. Facing inadequacy and being good enough: psychiatric care providers’ narratives about experiencing and coping with troubled conscience. J Psych and Ment Health Nursing. 2009;16:242-24.

Dahlqvist V, Eriksson S, Glasberg AN, Lindahl E, Lutzen K, Strandberg G, et al. Development of the perceptions of conscience questionnaire. Nursing Ethics. 2007;14(2):181-93.

Sørlie V, Jansson L, Norberg A. The meaning of being in ethically difficult care situations in paediatric care as narrated by female registered nurses. Scand J Caring Sciences. 2003;17:285-92.

Juthberg C, Sundin K. Registered nurses' and nurse assistants' lived experience of troubled conscience in their work in elderly care-a phenomenological hermeneutic study. Int J Nursing Stud. 2010;47:20-9.

Sorlie V, Norberg A. Development of the perceptions of conscience questionnaire. Nursing Ethics. 2007;14(2):181-93.

Garrard J. Health sciences literature review made easy: the matrix method. 2nd ed. New York: Sudbury (MA), Jones and Bartlett. 2007; 55-62.

Polit DF, Beck CT, Hungler BP. Essentials of nursing research: methods, appraisal, and utilization. 5th ed. Lippincott Co. USA. 2005;373-404.

Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH. Psychometric theory. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw- Hill Inc. 1994;103-7.

Hutcheson GD, Sofroniou N. The multivariate social scientist: introductory statistic using generalized linear models. London: Sage publication. 1999; 112-13.

Knapp TR, Brown JK. Ten measurement commandments that often should be broken. Research in Nursing and Health. 1995;18:495-69.

Glasberg AN, Eriksson S, Dahlqvist V, Lindahl E, Strandberg G, Soderberg A, et al. Development and initial validation of the stress of conscience questionnaire. Nursing Ethics. 2006;13(6):633-48.

Johnston M-J. Bioethics: a nursing perspective. 4th edition, London: Churchill Livingstone2006; 73-75.

Jafari MT. [Conscience (Persian)]. 4th ed. Tehran: Institute for the Publication of Allameh Jafari’s works. 2010;21-56.

Sanea Pour M. [Philosophy of ethics and religion (Persian)]. 2nd ed. Tehran: Center for Studies of Aftab Development. 2010;17-19.

Norberg A. Editorial comment. Nursing Ethics. 2002;9(1):1.

Hoose J. Conscience in world religions. Leominister UK Gracewing and Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press. 1999;44.

Haddad A. A matter of conscience. Reg Nurse. 2007;70(4):24.

Curtin L. Conscience and clinical care. Nurs Manag. 1993;24(8):26-9.

May T. Rights of conscience in health care. Social Theory and Practice. 2001; 27(1):111-18.

Childress JF. Appeals to conscience. Ethics 1979; 89: 315_35.

Von Post I. Perioperative nurses’ encounter with value conflicts: a descriptive study. Scand J caring Sciences. 1998;12(2):81-8.

Costigane H. A history of the Western idea of conscience. In: Hoose J. Conscience in world religions. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press. 1999; 62-98.

Kavanaugh J. Conscience matters. America. 1997; 176(17):19-20.

Vacek E. Do 'good people' need confession? America. 2002; 186(6):11-17.

Thampson IE, Melia KM, Boyd KM, Horsburgh D. Nursing Ethics. 5th ed. London: Churchill Livingstone 2006; 341-4.

Vanaki Z, Memarian R. Professional ethics: beyond the clinical competency. J Prof Nurs. 2009; 25(5):285-91.

Juthberg C, Eriksson S, Norberg A, Sundin K. Perception of conscience in relation to stress of conscience. Nursing Ethics. 2007;14(3):329-43.

Meyer W. Therapy of the conscience: technical recommendations for working on the harsh superego of the patient. Clinical Social Work Journal. 1998; 26(4):353-68.

Gaylin W. Conscience: knowing good and doing good. The Hastings Center Report. 1994; 24(3):36.

Levy S. Thomas Reid's defense of conscience. History of Philosophy Quarterly. 1999; 16(4):413-35.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22110/jkums.v17i8.586

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.